冷却的煤烟对环境的危害减少

Refrigerating coal-plant emissions ¹ would reduce levels of dangerous chemicals that pour into the air -- including carbon dioxide by more than 90 percent -- at a cost of 25 percent efficiency, according to a simple math-driven formula designed by a team of University of Oregon physicists ³. The computations for such a system, prepared on an electronic spreadsheet（电子数据表）, appeared in Physical Review E, a journal of the American Physical Society., ,In a separate, unpublished and preliminary（初步的） economic analysis, the scientists argue that the "energy penalty" would raise electricity costs by about a quarter but also reap huge societal benefits through subsequent reductions of health-care and climate-change costs associated with burning coal. An energy penalty is the reduction of electricity available for sale to consumers if plants used the same amounts of coal to maintain electrical output while using a cryogenic cleanup., ,"The cryogenic treatment of flue gasses from pulverized ⁴ coal plant is possible, and I think affordable ⁵, especially with respect to the total societal costs of burning coal," said UO physicist ² Russell J. Donnelly, whose research team was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy for the work detailed ⁶ in the published journal article., ,"In the U.S., we have about 1,400 electric-generating unit powered by coal, operated at about 600 power plants," Donnelly said. That energy, he added, is sold at about 5.6 cents per kilowatt-hour, according to a 2006 Congressional Budget Office estimate. "The estimated health costs of burning coal in the U.S. are in the range of $150 billion to $380 billion, including 18,000-46,000 premature ⁷ deaths, 540,000 asthma⁸（哮喘） attacks, 13,000 emergency room visits and two million missed work or school days each year.", ,In their separate economic analysis, Donnelly and UO research assistant Robert E. Hershberger, also a co-author on the journal paper, estimate that implementing⁹（贯彻，执行） large-scale cryogenic systems into coal-fired plants would reduce overall costs to society by 38 percent through the sharp reduction of associated health-care and climate-change costs. Not in the equation, Donnelly said, are the front-end health-care costs involved in coal extraction through mining., ,The cryogenic concept is not new. Donnelly experimented briefly ¹⁰ in the 1960s with a paper mill in Springfield, Ore., to successfully remove odor-causing gasses filling the area around the plant using cryogenics. Subsequently the National Science Foundation funded a major study to capture sulfur ¹¹ dioxide emissions -- a contributor to acid rain -- from coal burning plants. The grant included a detailed engineering study by the Bechtel Corp. of San Francisco., ,The Bechtel study showed that the cryogenic（冷冻的） process would work very well, but noted ¹² that large quantities of carbon dioxide also would be condensed, a consequence that raised no concerns in 1978. "Today we recognize that carbon dioxide emissions are a leading contributor to climate-warming factors attributed to humans," Donnelly said.